Whether you want to start a sole proprietorship or a company, Partena Professional helps you start your business 100% digitally with personal assistance by our experts.
Have you been appointed co-owner, active partner or self-employed helper and you want to register as a self-employed person?
want to know more about our services or want to chat with our experts? Visit one of our offices near you.
Increase your chances of success with our experts' help.
Our experts will give you the answers you seek.
Alter your business details via our one-stop shop for entrepreneurs.
Discover our practical tool for your social insurance dossier.
Want to know more about our services or want to chat with our experts? Visit one of our offices near you.
and reap the benefits of our social secretariat's support.
Take advantage of Partena Professional's expertise and knowledge
Discover the benefits we can give you as an accountant.
The Court of Cassation recently ruled on the question whether the contractual clauses of reduced notice (of at least 7 days) must be included in the ‘click system’ in case of dismissal of a manual worker with less than 6 months of uninterrupted service on 31 December 2013.
The position of the Court of Cassation in this respect contradicts the position adopted by the FPS Employment and the ONEm/RVA, according to which this reduced notice period must be taken into account when determining the first part of the notice period.
As a reminder, since the unified status came into force on 1 January 2014, the notice periods for employees of whom the performance of the contract begins as from 1 January 2014 are identical for manual and non-manual workers. They are expressed in weeks on the basis of seniority alone.
For employees of whom the performance of the contract began before 1 January 2014, the notice periods are calculated by applying the ‘click system’. This is a 3-step calculation:
Prior to the entry into force of the unified statute, it was possible to insert a reduced notice clause for manual workers in the employment contract or work regulations, derogating from the often longer ‘ordinary’ legal or sectoral notices. This contractual clause of reduced notice could provide that in case of dismissal of a manual worker with less than six months of uninterrupted service, a reduced notice period of (at least) 7 days could be given. In the case of resignation, the period of notice could not exceed half the period agreed upon for the notice given by the employer.
In the event of the termination of a contract as from 1 January 2014 of a manual worker whose performance of the contract began before 1 January 2014 and who has less than 6 months of uninterrupted service on 31 December 2013, should the reduced contractual notice of 7 days (in the event of dismissal) or the ‘ordinary’ (legal or sectoral) notice be applied when determining the period of notice on 31 December 2013 (1st part)? In other words, what period must be ‘clicked’?
The position adopted by the FPS Employment, Labour and Social Dialogue and the ONEm/RVA is to take into account the reduced contractual notice, i.e. 7 days.
The Court of Cassation decided otherwise in a judgment of 12 April 2021.
After 31 December 2013, the employment contract may still be terminated in accordance with a contractual clause of reduced notice if the dismissal occurs before the employee has acquired 6 months of uninterrupted service in the company. As since 1 January 2014, it is no longer allowed to provide for such clauses, it is therefore no longer possible to use them.
If a manual worker with less than 6 months of uninterrupted service on 31 December 2013 is dismissed after 6 months of interrupted service, the employer must take into account the ‘ordinary’ (legal or sectoral) notice periods applicable on 31 December 2013 when determining the first part of the notice period (and not the reduced contractual notice period of 7 days).
It is likely that the FPS Employment, Labour and Social Dialogue and the ONEm/RVA will adapt their position in accordance with the judgment of the Court of Cassation.
Source: Court of Cassation judgment of 12 April 2021 (S.20.0022.N).
The Partena Professional website is a channel for making information available in an understandable form to affiliated members and non-members. Partena Professional strives to provide up-to-date information and this information is compiled with the greatest care (including in the form of Infoflashes). However, as social and fiscal legislation is constantly changing, Partena Professional cannot accept any liability for the correctness, the up-to-date or the completeness of the information consulted or exchanged via this website. Further provisions can be read in our general disclaimer that applies to every consultation of this website. By consulting this website, you expressly accept the provisions of this disclaimer. Partena Professional can unilaterally change the content of this disclaimer.