want to know more about our services or want to chat with our experts? Visit one of our offices near you.
Increase your chances of success with our experts' help.
Our experts will give you the answers you seek.
Alter your business details via our one-stop shop for entrepreneurs.
Discover our practical tool for your social insurance dossier.
Want to know more about our services or want to chat with our experts? Visit one of our offices near you.
and reap the benefits of our social secretariat's support.
Take advantage of Partena Professional's expertise and knowledge
Discover the benefits we can give you as an accountant.
The European Court of Human Rights has handed down a judgement on 5 September 2017. A good opportunity for us to briefly refresh the principles applicable in Belgium if the use by the employee of email and internet access that is made available to him by the employer is monitored.
The European Court of Human Rights has ruled in the judgement of 5 September 2017 that emails of employees in the workplace are covered by the notions of 'privacy' and 'correspondence' within the meaning of article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and fundamental freedoms.
In the case that was brought before the Court, the employer had dismissed an employee after having monitored his emails and having found that he had used his Internet access for private purposes. Private use was prohibited by the internal rules of which the employee had been informed.
For the Court, the right of the employee to respect for his privacy and correspondence however was not adequately protected and this, because the national (Romanian) courts amongst other things:
A lot of employers offer their employees an email address and/or Internet access, not only for communication purposes within the company/with third parties, but also to increase the productivity and quality of work.
If these tools in principle are intended for professional purposes only, the employer generally tolerates that these are also used for private purposes (e.g. obligation to use the Internet access for private purposes only during the breaks).
Mind that if there is no legal/regulatory provision in this respect, the employer will have to see to it that the principles and rules for the use of email and internet are laid down in a written document (preferably in the employment regulations).
If the employer wants to monitor the private use of email and Internet access, he must comply with the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) No. 81 of 26 April 2002 on the protection of employees’ privacy for the purposes of the control of electronic on-line communication data.
The principle of finality
The employer can globally monitor the employee’s use of email and internet access for private purposes, when pursuing one or several of the following aims:
The principle of proportionality
In the context of this monitoring, only the electronic on-line communication data of a private nature can be gathered that are adequate, relevant and non-excessive in relation to the pursued purpose. This must be global data (e.g. number of emails sent from one workstation).
The principle of transparency
The employer who wants to monitor the electronic on-line communication data must previously inform their employees and their representatives of this (preferably via the employment regulations).
When the employer detects an irregularity during the monitoring, under certain condition he may proceed to the individualisation of the gathered data in order to identify the author of the irregularity.
Mind that it is forbidden to read the content of the electronic communication data, except when all parties involved have (particularly) agreed to this.
In our opinion, the judgement of the European Court of Human Rights is in line with several decisions that have been taken by the Belgian labour courts.
Although subject to the sovereign powers of appreciation of the labour courts, improper use by the employee of email/Internet access that is made available to him may give rise to his dismissal in the following cases:
Sources: collective bargaining agreement No 81 of 26 April 2002 for the protection of the privacy of employees with regard to the monitoring of the electronic on-line communication data (Royal Decree 12 June 2002 - Belgian Official Gazette of 29 June 2002), http://www.cnt-nar.be; decision of 5 September 2017 of the European Court of Human Rights, Bărbulescu v. Romania, Application No. 61496/08, http://www.echr.coe.int.
The Partena Professional website is a channel for making information available in an understandable form to affiliated members and non-members. Partena Professional strives to provide up-to-date information and this information is compiled with the greatest care (including in the form of Infoflashes). However, as social and fiscal legislation is constantly changing, Partena Professional cannot accept any liability for the correctness, the up-to-date or the completeness of the information consulted or exchanged via this website. Further provisions can be read in our general disclaimer that applies to every consultation of this website. By consulting this website, you expressly accept the provisions of this disclaimer. Partena Professional can unilaterally change the content of this disclaimer.